MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990084462

From Corporate Settler Food Regimes to Sustainable Urban Food Systems: Food as a Right of Citizenship and the Democratisation of Food Systems

2023· other· en· W6990084462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood systemsCommodificationCitizenshipLivelihoodFood sovereigntyIndigenousCommonsUrbanizationCorporate governanceColonialism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Major Paper combines an approach from the disciplines of urban planning, political economy, environmental studies and health studies to deconstruct the role of the settler state and economic institutions in Canada in the contemporary urban food system. It examines the inequalities of power and property in the corporate settler food regime to explain the relationship between processes such as colonialism, capitalism, and urbanisation in how food is produced, distributed, consumed and disposed in the city. Part One explores the idea of the food-city nexus, and the application of food systems as a strategic lever to enhance related urban systems, such as housing and transportation in the city. Part Two demonstrates the ways in which the ongoing settler colonial project in the region now-known as Canada is at the heart of the dominant food system in urban space, with examples of the ways in which early colonial violence dispossessed Indigenous peoples of their territory, and destroyed their social and cultural food practices. Part Three argues that the commodification of food and the control of food distribution in cities by market entities is irrational, constricts food access, and is detrimental to the health of consumers, the livelihood of farmers and farmworkers, and the future of the natural environment. Part Four offers sustainable urban food systems as a framework for a way forward; it argues that the alternative to the dominant settler colonial and capitalist food system is to adopt the view of food citizenship and food as commons in the city. Here, we offer six guiding values that are essential to an urban food system where food citizenship is adopted by urban residents, and food is governed as commons: localness, universality, sustainable resource management, culture and social connectedness, food as an essential public service, and citizen-centred policy and engagement. This research has been written with the aim to present academic research in urban food systems planning to public non-academic audiences in a way that feels universal and relevant. The objective is to equip general audiences with ideas, terminology and concepts about the processes and actors in the settler corporate food regime so that they are able to develop a critical understanding of their impact on, and their interaction with, the urban food system. As this information is often hidden behind a price tag at the local supermarket, it may seem distant to urban food consumers. The value of presenting this research to public audiences, rather than to only the academy, is to bring reflexivity into everyday ordinary food practice. This process leads to a careful consideration of the impact of one’s choices and actions on the health and wellbeing of the individual, the collective and the natural ecological environment for present and future generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.064
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→