MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990125704

Content analysis and evaluation of scientific productions in the subject area of organic food: A scientometric study

2024· article· en· W6990125704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliometricsSubject (documents)Quarter (Canadian coin)Web of scienceScientific literatureOrganic farmingSociology of scientific knowledgeFood processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aim: The purpose of organic food production is to keep human health and impose minimum damage to the environment. Regarding the need for organic food production, the aim of the current research is to analyze and investigate the scientific outputs of the organic food field, which are indexed in the Web of Science (WoS). Materials and methods: The present study is descriptive which was carried out, applying a scientific approach. The scientific productions in the field of organic food were extracted from WoS database and all subject areas related to organic food were investigated. The extracted data were analyzed through Bibliometrix and its graphical user interface, Biblioshiny. Bibliometrics package as well as SPSS and Excel were used. Findings: The findings of the research state that strategic diagram is divided into four regions based on the degree of development (density index) and the degree of connection (centrality index). The first quarter represents the central and developmental topics which include organic food consumption. The second quarter of the graph depicts the special topics of this field, which include antioxidant activity, biological density factor, Listeria monocytogenes (the name of a pathogenic bacterium) and Escherichia coli (the name of a bacterium). The topics in the second area have high density and low centrality. The third quarter covers topics that have low density and centrality. These topics are emerging or declining which includes the issue of agricultural networks is the quarter. The fourth quarter represents basic topics which has low density but high centrality. This area includes food management, health quality and nutritional quality of vegetables. Conclusion: The results state that researches in the field of organic food have focused on topics such as attitudes, consumption behaviors and willingness to buy organic food, as well as the quality of organic products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.1160.163
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.422
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicOrganic Food and Agriculture→French-language works237,207→