Desempeño ocupacional y satisfacción de los cuidadores primarios informales de pacientes con limitación en la actividad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary family caregivers have a significant role for the people who require their care. When a person cannot perform any or several activities of self-care, recreation, and productivity, whether due to an injury, illness or disability, the support of another person is needed to help them complete or carry out their activities. For this reason, who fulfills the role of primary informal family caregiver can present problems in their performance and in the occupational satisfaction that they obtain during the work of care, compromising their well-being and health. The present investigation aimed to determine the relationship between performance and occupational satisfaction of primary family caregivers and the degree of limitation in the activity of the patients in their care. To 18 informal primary caregivers were taken sociodemographic variables and then the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was applied to know their performance and occupational satisfaction. While the instrument known as Checklist of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, was used to their respective patients to know the degree of limitation in their activities. The results showed that 83.3% of the caregivers studied were women, with an average age of 46.6 ± 13.4 years, most of them being mothers of the patients, housewives, married and with a superior level of education (50%). On average, primary caregivers showed moderate impairments in performance (5.46 ± 1.85) and occupational satisfaction (5.43 ± 1.91). On the other hand, 27.7% of the patients obtained a moderate limitation in the activity, and 27.7% presented a severe limitation in the activity. We found a negative correlation (r = -0.582, p = 0.0114, Spearman's correlation coefficient) between the level of satisfaction of the caregivers and the limitation in the activity of the patients under their care. Likewise, a negative correlation was found between the occupational performance of the caregiver and the limitation in the activity of the patients under their supervision (r = -0.553, p = 0.0173, Spearman's correlation coefficient). According to the results obtained, it was found that the higher the limitation in the activity of the patients who attended the University Rehabilitation Unit, the higher the impact on the level of performance and occupational satisfaction of the primary informal family caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".