Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The videocassette is a varied teaching aide with eight open ended dramatizations to stimulate discussion about ethical dilemmas which are based on actual cases. They include: The Old Person's Friend: portrays in a hospital setting the dilemma of whether of treat a very old incompetent woman who develops pneumonia (20.5.1). The Courage of One's Convictions: discusses the right to refuse treatment in the context of a young Jehovah's Witness member (8.3.4; 1.2; 19.4). A Chronic Problem: shows a chronically ill patient to illustrate the need for giving equal respect to acute and chronic patients (8.1; 9.8). Critical Choice: Allocation of Scarce Resources: resource allocation options involved in complex transplant procedures are presented in a case about a child who needs a liver to survive (9.3; 9.4; 19.6). Who Should Decide?: concerns prenatal diagnosis of a spina bifida fetus carried by a woman who has spina bifida, and presents the different views of the family in considering whether to abort or to have the baby (15.2; 12.3). Family Tree: social workers, a physician, and the mother discuss sterilization in an ectopic pregnancy where the mother has many societal problems (11.3; 9.1). If You Want a Girl Like Me: a teenage mother wants to stop treatment on a severely handicapped newborn while the father and his parents argue against such an action (20.5.2). Happy Birthday: considers the dilemma of a young Canadian chemist who has been offered a job working on chemical warfare weapons for the U.S. Army (21.3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it