Difficulties on Southwestern Frontier. Message from the President of the United States, communicating, in compliance with a resolution of the House, information in reference to the difficulties on the southwestern frontier.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SrR: Should the authority for which I have applied in a former communication be granted, to concentrate the infantry of my command and to keep the cavalry in the field, the plan I propose to adopt will be to break up the pos1 s of Fort Brown, Ringgold barracks, and Fort Mcintosh, and increase the garrison at Fort Duncan, on the Rio Grande; leaving small commands of infantry at the posts along the mail-route from San Antonio to El Paso, to keep the road open, the remainder of this arm could be advantageously concentrated at Camp Cooper, ou the Comanche reservation, so as to give security and confidence to the settlers in the northern and eastern portions of Texas.The largest portion of the cavalry wight have a depot somewhere in the vicinity of Camp Radziminski, so as to be able to scout the whole of the country on the Canadian, Washita, and Red rivers, as far as 103 of west longitude, and to the south as far as the line of the Memphis overland mail-route to California.Another mounted force, should a few additional companies of cavalry be placed under my command, could be most profitably employed in scouting the country along the El Paso mail-route, between Forts Lancaster and Davis, passing as far north along the Comanche war trail as the Staked Plains, and as far south as the Rio Grande, or, in case of hot pursuit, to follow hostile parties into Chihuahua.With such an arrangement as the above, to go into operation early next spring, I am satisfied the Comanches and their allies could soon be brought to terms, and the government saved an enormous expense, which must continue to be incurred so long as the defensive system alone is pursued.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".