MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990515585

Development of a virtual peritoneal dialysis resource for registered nurses

2024· report· en· W6990515585 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2024
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisPatient educationResource (disambiguation)Patient careDialysisContinuing educationMEDLINECritical appraisalVendor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a common renal replacement therapy for patients with \nend-stage renal disease (ESRD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Poor care of patients who \nuse PD could lead to severe complications, including peritonitis, exit-site infection, technique \nfailure and death. To ensure safe and effective peritoneal dialysis, nurses must receive \ncomprehensive education and training on the proper techniques and procedures involved in the \nprocess. This will help them develop the skills and expertise to perform PD tasks proficiently and \nprovide the best care to patients undergoing dialysis treatment. Purpose: To assess current \nevidence on virtual education methods to develop an educational resource for registered nurses \nproviding care to patients who use peritoneal dialysis. Methods: Three methods were used to \ncollect information for this project. First, an integrative literature review was conducted using a \nliterature search in CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. Eleven relevant articles were identified, and \nresearch studies were critically appraised using standardized appraisal tools. Second, \nconsultations with stakeholders (i.e., registered nurses, physicians, managers, patient care \nfacilitators, and vendor representatives) were conducted to determine the learning needs of \nregistered nurses in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and gather recommendations and \nfeedback from all stakeholders regarding the development of a virtual peritoneal dialysis \nresource. Finally, an environmental scan was conducted to determine current resources and the \nbest options for registered nurses. Findings: Registered nurses were effectively educated on \nperitoneal dialysis through virtual education methods, which included computer-assisted \nprograms, e-modules, and Microsoft Teams. These findings aligned with the outcomes of the \nconsultations and environmental scan. Conclusion: Limited literature exists on virtual methods \nto educate nurses about peritoneal dialysis. However, available research confirms the \neffectiveness of online methods for this purpose. An evidence-based virtual peritoneal dialysis \nresource has been developed to aid nurses in caring for patients who use peritoneal dialysis. This \nvirtual resource will be shared with Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services (NLHS) \nmembers so they can plan to implement it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)French-language works237,207