MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990588741

The economic impact of climate change on cash crop farms in Québec and Ontario

2014· other· en· W6990588741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeEconomic impact analysisCash cropCropProduction (economics)Impact assessmentResource (disambiguation)CashClimate model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study estimated the economic impact of climate change on representative cash crop farms at selected sites in Québec and Ontario over the period 2010 to 2039 using a Mixed Integer Dynamic Linear Programming Model. Five climate scenarios (Hot & Dry, Hot & Humid, Median, Cold & Dry and Cold & Humid) and four weather conditions (the combination of with and without Carbon Dioxide (CO2) enhancement and water limitation) were selected and combined to form 20 different scenarios. Four major cash crops, i.e. corn, soybean, wheat, and barley, were considered using both reference and improved cultivars. Historical data on crop yields were used to validate the Decision Support System for Agro-Technology Transfer (DSSAT) model which was used to project future yields. Economic variables, such as cost of production and crop prices were projected using Monte Carlo simulation with Crystal Ball Predictor. The results indicate that the optimal resource allocation, outputs, net returns, economic vulnerability, and adaptation strategies were dependent on the climate scenarios, weather conditions, types of crop and variety, as well as site. Water accessibility plays an essential role in farm profitability, especially coupled with atmospheric CO2 enhancement. Producers at all sites and scenarios were worse off under unfavorable weather condition when water was limited and CO2 enhancement was absent, especially in Ste-Martine where producers were predicted to have a number of years with successive financial losses. Different climate scenarios also had different impacts on farm management. The representative farm in Ste-Martine performs best under the Hot & Dry scenario if water was adequate, while in North Dundas, the Median or Cold scenarios were preferred. Technological development decreased farm financial vulnerability for all sites and scenarios. Institutional development, in terms of insurance programs and risk management tools, were also used to improve resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→French-language works237,207→