MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990651655

Ecological and social factors affecting the local habitat distribution of western sandpipers wintering at Bah?Santa Mar? Northwest Mexico

2005· dissertation· en· W6990651655 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsForagingPredationHabitatMarshCalidrisBrackish waterBrackish marsh
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of habitat selection often requires individuals to choose among habitats that differ in foraging profitability and predation danger. The local habitat distribution of Western Sandpipers (Calidris maur~] was studied at Bahia Santa Maria, northwest Mexico, for three non-breeding seasons (1 999-2002). Western Sandpipers are highly sexually dimorphic, males being lighter and smaller-billed than females, and thus males may use visual foraging more often, be more susceptible to interference, and be less vulnerable to predation than females. Bahia Santa Maria supports over 350,000 Western Sandpipers in a diverse mosaic of habitats. Three habitats were categorized - brackish flats, mangroves, and cattail marshes- that differed with respect to food abundance and predation danger. Brackish flats were high-food and low-danger, while mangroves and cattail marshes were low-food and high-danger. Sandpiper and prey densities covaried positively among habitats, with brackish flats supporting the highest bird density. Males, and adults within each sex, were over-represented in brackish flats and mangroves. Sex ratios, and age ratios within each sex, were more evenly represented in cattail marshes. Compared with females, males were biased towards visual foraging and using drier substrates, changed their foraging behaviour more as flock size increased, were more likely to be territorial and aggressive, and allocated less time to anti-predator behaviour. Sex differences in foraging behaviour were consistent among habitats. Birds in brackish flats and mangroves were more biased towards visual foraging than those in cattail marshes. In brackish flats, birds changed their foraging behaviour more strongly with increasing flock size. Territoriality was observed in brackish flats and mangroves. Territory length appeared to be related to intruder pressure. Sandpipers apparently perceived cattail marshes as more dangerous than brackish flats and adjusted their anti-predator behaviour accordingly. Significant numbers of birds occurred in habitats with lower food availability and greater predation danger, suggesting a density-dependent devaluation of brackish flats. Overall, there is evidence that (0 females are more constrained by predation danger and males more constrained by interference, and (;I] that density-dependent competition is important in shaping local distributions of sandpipers during the non-breeding season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→