MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990678530

Effects of Predator Management and Parasitism on Over-Water Nesting Diving Duck Production in Southwestern Manitoba

2021· article· en· W6990678530 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouth Dakota State UniversityU.S. Geological SurveyUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsWaterfowlNest (protein structural motif)Nesting (process)AnatidaeLimitingPredatorHost (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nest survival of upland nesting waterfowl (e.g., mallard [Anas platyrhynchos], blue-winged teal [Anas discors]) has been studied extensively in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America. Conversely, over-water nesting diving ducks’ nest survival is poorly understood, likely because over-water nests are more challenging to find, may be less concentrated, and searching for these nests is physically demanding. Nest depredation is considered a leading cause of duck nest failure and is considered a limiting factor on upland nesting waterfowl production in the PPR. Similar factors limiting upland nesting duck production may limit over-water nesting duck productivity, but studies of this nature are lacking. Another limiting factor may be nest parasitism, an under looked attribute for some of these over-water nesting ducks (e.g., canvasbacks [Aythya valisineria]). Some species, particularly the redhead (Aythya americana), have adapted to habitat constraints by parasitizing other ducks’ nests. In previous studies, 30%–50% of canvasback nests were parasitized by redheads, with an average of 3 parasitic eggs laid per nest. For these studies we first evaluated the efficacy of predator trapping and removal on the survival of over-water duck nests of five focal species of diving ducks in Southwestern Manitoba. To further understand nest parasitism in diving ducks, we tracked host and parasitic eggs of redheads in canvasback nests in southwestern Manitoba, Canada, during the 2019 and 2020 nesting seasons. We counted all eggs found at host nest sites and classified eggs as successful, lost to parasitism, or depredated. Although mean nest survival was greater on traditional trapped sites, confidence interval estimates indicated an equivocal treatment effect. Thus, trapping predators had, at best, a modest positive influence on survival of over-water duck nests and did not generally appear to be an effective way to increase nest survival for these five focal species. We do, however, suggest that redhead parasitism may be a factor limiting canvasback productivity in our study area and deserves further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)Same topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207