MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990751384

Engineering a wildfire decision support system through the integration of AIXI and the Canadian Fire Weather Index

2014· other· en· W6990751384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Canberra Research Portal · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision support systemVariety (cybernetics)Reinforcement learningUnificationProcess (computing)Resource (disambiguation)Human systems engineeringNatural resource
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fires have been a major source of destruction in Australia, causing enormous ecological and economic damage, as well as loss of human life. Anthropogenic pressure around fire events worldEwide, including Australia, has led to the need for better human decisionEmaking and fire risk evaluation. To this end, fireE\nmodelling and simulation systems have been developed through a variety of forms. However in the existing literature, there is a paucity of information regarding applications of artificial general intelligence in wildfire and natural resource management. The general reinforcement learning method AIXI offers a system capable of making decisions based on an objectively defined reward system and also offers an entirely different approach to natural resource management from conventional decision support systems. \nThis thesis integrates AIXI and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) System. Both systems share a common structure that makes them amenable to unification in a reinforcement learning framework. This framework forms the basis for their integration into a novel decision support system (FWIEAIXI). \nWith a fully specified FWIEAIXI, the thesis explores the point at which FWIEAIXI can maintain an “acceptable” behaviour in spite of exceptional, unforseen or nonE standard conditions. Through a robustnessEtesting framework, the thesis shows that FWIEAIXI is capable of acting with a diverse range of meteorological inputs. \nThe thesis also provides an information theoretic assessment of FWIEAIXI’s decision making behaviour, where the level of complexity in FWIEAIXI’s decision making process is determined and characterised. For this, six information theoretic measures are introduced. Applications of the six measures show that \nFWIEAIXI utilises prediction, planning and policymaking during its decision making processes. Furthermore, it is shown that FWIEAIXI is a system capable of planning 14 to 21 days into the future in matters of wildfire and natural resource management. \nWith a comparison between FWIEAIXI and human decision making in wildfire management scenarios, this thesis also shows that an iterative application of fuel suppression and the application of controlled burns on only the most favourable of days, is indicative of an optimal wildfire and natural resource management policy.\nThis thesis demonstrates that the application of AIXI in wildfire management scenarios offers a practical demonstration of applied AIXI theory. Finally, the thesis concludes with a discussion of future extension of this work, along with new avenues for research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Canberra Research PortalSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207