El aprendizaje-servicio en la formación inicial docente: una oportunidad para fomentar la responsabilidad y la inclusión
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La realización de proyectos de Aprendizaje-Servicio forma parte del Plan Estratégico de la Universidad San Jorge. En este contexto es donde emerge este proyecto de Aprendizaje-Servicio que lleva como título: “Construimos un ecosistema de innovación educativa: desarrollo de sesiones de Grupos Interactivos” La finalidad de este proyecto es favorecer que el estudiantado del Grado en Educación Primaria aplique las competencias desarrolladas en sus estudios para responder a una necesidad detectada por el CEIP Ciudad de Zaragoza. La realidad intercultural de esta comunidad educativa escolar y la diversificación en las aulas, exige nuevos planteamientos pedagógicos que den respuesta a estos grandes retos educativos y sociales. Estos retos educativos suponen una gran oportunidad de aprendizaje para estos estudiantes universitarios, pues a través de un enfoque inclusivo de la educación diseñan y desarrollan sesiones de Grupos Interactivos que dan respuestas a estas necesidades reales de esta comunidad educativa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".