An Enduring Popularity: Sir Isaac Brock and Canada, 1812-2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hailed for his spirited defence of what is now Ontario at the outset of the War of 1812, Major General Isaac Brock was widely mourned after his valiant death only four months into that conflict. His daring deeds brought a posthumous knighthood and popular recognition as “The Hero of Upper Canada.” There was also a lasting positive effect on the collective memory of British North Americans, and the patriotism generated by Brock’s legacy was frequently exploited to promote a strong attachment to the British Crown. For much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Brock’s name was a watchword for all those Canadians who wished to preserve the imperial connection. And when increasingly nationalistic attitudes began to displace the imperial emphasis, Brock’s heroism was adapted to provide a compelling historical explanation for Canadian Confederation. Not surprisingly, the appeal of a larger-than-life hero was advantageous in promoting the aims of both imperial and national schools of thought. Less clear, however, are the mechanisms by which Brock became a powerful icon to both movements. How did these respective ideas involving Brock originate, and by what manner were they promulgated? To arrive at a better understanding of such an enigmatic process, this dissertation combines military and social history to explore Brock’s enduring popularity within the Canadian context between 1812 and 2012. Central to this unique study is the militia myth, or the traditional story that originated with the War of 1812 and exaggerated the role of Upper Canada’s civilian military force in defending the province. By a further survey of such phenomena as the Ontario-centric commemorations dedicated to Brock’s memory and the indoctrination of impressionable young minds through the collaboration of the Ontario Department of Education and the Canadian publishing industry, the significance of a heroic figure to the formation of a distinctly Canadian national creation myth will be revealed as exercises in social engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".