Évaluation auditivo-perceptive de la résonance et de la parole en lien avec la fonction vélopharyngée : validation de contenu d’une liste de phrases en français québécois = Auditory-perceptual assessment of resonance and speechrelated to velopharyngeal function: Content validation of alist of sentences in Québec French
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abrégé Le besoin d’un échantillon de parole de qualité pour l’évaluation des individus présentant une dysfonction vélopharyngée est reconnu depuis longtemps. Or, à ce jour, aucune liste de phrases contrôlées n’a été publiée pour l’évaluation auditivo-perceptive de la fonction vélopharyngée en français québécois. Le but du présent projet clinique était donc de développer et de valider une liste de phrases contrôlées en français québécois. Suivant un processus délibératif, ce projet de recherche-action effectué en collaboration avec des orthophonistes expertes dans le domaine des troubles de la résonance et des dysfonctions vélopharyngées s’est effectué en deux phases : (a) la création de la liste de phrases et (b) la validation de contenu des phrases et la documentation de leurs caractéristiques d’utilisation. Lors de la phase 1, les membres d’une communauté de pratique ont développé 20 phrases en suivant des critères phonético-linguistiques spécifiques. La phase 2 a débuté par l’envoi d’un questionnaire pour évaluer le respect et l’exhaustivité des critères pour chacune des phrases et pour documenter les contextes d’utilisation de l’outil. Le questionnaire a été rempli par 13 orthophonistes utilisant la liste de phrases dans leur pratique. Ensuite, deux rencontres de groupe ont été effectuées pour discuter des modifications finales à apporter à la liste. La liste de phrases est considérée par les orthophonistes expertes comme présentant une bonne validité de contenu. Les expertes recommandent l’utilisation de la liste de phrases finale dans le contexte de l’évaluation auditivo-perceptive à partir de trois ou quatre ans et jusqu’à l’âge adulte. Abstract It has long been recognized that a quality speech sample is needed to assess individuals with velopharyngeal dysfunction. However, no list of controlled sentences in Québec French has been published for the auditory-perceptual assessment of velopharyngeal function to date. The goal of this clinical project was therefore to develop and validate a list of controlled sentences in Québec French. Using a deliberative inquiry, this action research project was carried out in collaboration with speech-language pathologists with expertise in resonance disorders and velopharyngeal dysfunctions in two phases: (a) creation of the list of sentences and (b) content validation of the sentences and documentation of their usage characteristics. In Phase 1, members of a community of practice developed 20 sentences based on specific phonetic-linguistic criteria. Phase 2 began by sending out a questionnaire to evaluate respect for and completeness of the criteria for each sentence and to document the contexts in which the tool was used. The questionnaire was completed by 13 speech-language pathologists who had used the list of sentences in their practice. Two group meetings were then held to discuss the final modifications to be made to the list. The expert speech-language pathologists considered the sentence list to have good content validity. They also recommend using the final version of the list of sentences when performing auditory-perceptual assessments of individuals aged 3-4 years to adulthood. © 2024, Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".