MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991057036

EXAMINING CHANGES IN MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH AND INFANT BEHAVIOUR AFTER PEER-DELIVERED TREATMENT FOR POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION

2022· dissertation· en· W6991057036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostpartum depressionDepression (economics)Intervention (counseling)Mental healthAnxietyRandomized controlled trialEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleSocial support
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects up to 20% of mothers and birthing parents, yet only 1 in 10 receive evidence-based treatment. Left untreated, PPD increases the risk of future depressive episodes, familial disharmony, and offspring problems. This study sought to determine if an online 9-week group cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention delivered by mothers who have recovered from postpartum depression (i.e., peers) can effectively improve PPD, anxiety, social support, the mother-infant relationship, and infant temperament in those with PPD. Methodology: During the COVID-19 pandemic, 183 participants were randomized into experimental (received intervention at baseline plus treatment as usual (TAU)) and waitlist control (TAU plus the intervention after a 9-week wait) groups. Participants were ≥18 years of age, had an infant <12 months old, were fluent in English and scored ≥10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Depression, anxiety, social support, mother-infant bonding, and infant behaviour were reported by all mothers at enrollment and 9-weeks later, and three months after that in the experimental group. Results: Participants in the experimental group experienced clinically and statistically significant improvements in PPD and anxiety post-treatment and three months later. Perceptions of social support, infant-focused anxiety, and negative emotionality in infants also improved immediately post-intervention and remained stable three months later in the experimental group. Conclusion: Online peer-delivered group CBT for PPD can effectively treat PPD and anxiety, as well as improve social support, the mother-infant relationship, and infant temperament. Online Peer-Delivered Group CBT for PPD is a novel approach to service delivery that can increase treatment uptake, providing mothers experiencing PPD with access to a credible and engaging source of help, and has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of PPD in Canada and around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→