MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991102895

Evaluation of fatty acids of salmon from different origins: comparison of extraction and derivatization methodologies

2017· other· en· W6991102895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital do IPB (Instituto Politecnico De Braganca) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)Fish <Actinopterygii>TransmethylationMackerel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global demand for fish and fish products has increased significantly over the last decades, which led to a simultaneous increase of aquaculture production around the world, currently corresponding to almost 50% of the global fish market [1]. Among different concerns regarding the fish that consumers are eating, nowadays, there is a demand for correct information about the species, production method (farmed vs. wild) and the catch origin/provenience of fish. Salmon, one of the most popular fish in Europe, can have different geographical origins and generally command higher prices when caught in the wild. Moreover, the commercially important species of salmon belong to different genus, namely Salmo and Oncorhynchus. Therefore, this work intended to compare the fatty acid composition of salmon from diverse origins, testing different extraction and derivatization methodologies. Farmed salmon specimens were obtaining from Chile, Canada and Norway. Two lipid extraction methods, namely conventional Soxhlet extraction using n-hexane added with butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and an adaptation of the Bligh and Dyer extraction using ultra-turrax homogenisation with 1% NaCl, followed by extraction with chloroform and methanol, were tested. Additionally, fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were prepared by two methodologies, namely by alkaline transmethylation using KOH and by acidcatalysed transmethylation using boron trifluoride-methanol solution. FAME were analysed in a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph equipped with a Shimadzu AOC-20i auto-injector and a flame ionisation detector (Shimadzu, Japan). A CP-Sil 88 silica capillary column (50 x 0.25 mm i.d, 0.20 μm) from Varian (Middelburg, Netherlands) was used for FAME separation. Injector and detector temperatures were 250 and 270 °C, respectively. The compounds were identified by comparison with standards (FAME 37, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Based on the obtained results, the ultra-turrax method was chosen for lipid extraction since it allowed obtaining higher amounts of long chain unsaturated fatty acids, particularly of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Similar results were obtained for both tested derivatization methodologies. Nonadecanoic acid (C19:0) was submitted to BF3/MeOH derivatization resulting in a high transmethylation yield (90.3%). In general, salmon samples showed high contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids, including ω-3 fatty acids, which supports its consumption as part of a healthy diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital do IPB (Instituto Politecnico De Braganca)French-language works237,207