MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991240322

French Families, Paper Facts: Genetics, Writing, and Intimate Histories.

2009· dissertation· en· W6991240322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingColonialismScope (computer science)HistoriographyImmigration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biogenetics dominates contemporary discussions—scientific, media, and in everyday talk—about the origins of diseases, ethnicities, tribes, and nations. This dissertation sheds light on the dynamics—of affect, history, memory, and bureaucracies—that shape and animate biogenetic explanations. The dissertation builds on fine-grained fieldwork at genomic databases, genealogical registries, family history societies, and medical clinics in Quebec to illuminate the conceptions of family, heredity, and human difference—often intertwined—that are defining analytic boundaries and the acceptance and use of evidence within medical genetics. The dissertation focuses on the multiple trajectories of a particular form of medical genetic evidence, the Catholic Church vital record. The Catholic Church mandated personal data record-taking during the Counter Reformation and, as a result, historically Catholic European countries and their numerous African, Asian, and American colonies have some of the most comprehensive catalogues of historic birth and marriage information in the world. Geneticists and medical researchers in Quebec use these records to infer long durée family genealogies and then deduce the origins of “French diseases.” The dissertation investigates the clinical, experimental, and historiographic rationales that sustain their genealogical conclusions and etiological explanations, as well as the rationales sustaining explanations of those who oppose them. The dissertation unearths the exigencies—from colonial French Church writing strictures to laboratory infrastructures—of how medical workers, genealogists, and people beyond the purview of health, medicine, and genealogy delineate families, risk, and race. In looking at how written cultures, colonial histories, family practices, and feelings about the past play a role in the production of genetic knowledge, the dissertation broadens the scope of traditional scholarly investigations of race and medicine. Many of these investigations, working within a Foucauldian rubric, have focused narrowly on constraints placed on consciousness by domineering state and social power structures. In contrast, this dissertation illustrates how diverse investments in ancestors and pragmatic choices about evidence also shape the styles of reasoning about family, heredity, and human groups that animate biogenetic worlds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeep Blue (University of Michigan)Same topicRace, Genetics, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207