Galling insect distribution on psychotria barbiflora (rubiaceae) in a fragment of atlantic forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se estudió la distribución de un Cecidomyiidae formador de agallas en las hojas, individuos y poblaciones de Psychotria barbiflora (Rubiaceae) en un fragmento de un bosque atlántico en Usina Serra Grande, Alagoas, Brasil. Se colectaron 345 hojas para caracterizar las agallas y analizar su patrón de distribución. El número de agallas por hoja infectada varió entre 1 y 100. La oviposición del insecto se produjo sobre las venas de la hoja en la región basal de la epidermis abaxial. El cecidomyiidae pareció preferir las hojas jóvenes ubicadas en el ápice de los brotes. El número total de hojas se correlacionó positivamente con la altura de las plantas, en tanto que el daño individual de las hojas se correlacionó negativamente, demostrando que la complejidad de los aglomerados y la densidad no afectan la tasa de ataque del insecto formador de agallas. De 213 plantas evaluadas, 93 tenían agallas (43.7%). La densidad espacial de la planta hospedera no afectó el daño individual de la hoja. El patrón observado de la distribución de agallas pudo ser debido a las estrategias del insecto para optimizar la nutrición de las agallas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".