Funkcjonowanie wiejskich cmentarzy parafii katolickichw dobie przedrozbiorowej na przykładzie dekanatów Nowa Góra, Skała i Proszowice z okolic Krakowa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The functioning of Catholic country parish cemeteries before the partitions of Poland : illustrated with the deaneries of Nowa Góra, Skała and Proszowice near Cracow The functioning of country cemeteries before the partitions of the Commonwealth is rather poorly researched. The article presents results of a preliminary analysis of data from parish records of funerals, which have proved an excellent source for the topic. The source basis was supplemented with records of bishops’ visitations from the Archives of the Archdiocese Curia in Cracow. The area analyzed, the deaneries of Nowa Góra, Skała and Proszowice comprising 35 parishes, is north of Cracow. The oldest early-Christian skeleton burials in Little Poland come from the turn of the 11th century. As the network of parishes developed in the 13th c., the dead began to be interred in churches and in cemeteries located next to churches. There were also mass graves for epidemic victims on the outskirts of settlements; dissenters were buried in unconsecrated ground (at crossroads, near roadside figures, in wastelands). Churches became burial sites for priests and the nobility, but sometimes also peasants, especially those of the country elite and church attendants. The church cemetery had burial places regarded as honourable (e.g. close to the church entrance) and places for average people. Burial fees differed according to the age of the deceased person, the location of the grave and the season of the year. As burial grounds were limited, remains were periodically exhumed and transferred to a mortuary, which was usually a wooden building next to the cemetery wall. When the mortuary was filled, the bones were reburied in a new mass grave, which was an occasionfor a solemn parish celebration. The cemetery was taken care of by the parishioners; for example they had to maintain the cemetery wall in good order. Gravediggers came from the poorer parishioners. They usually lived close to the church and usually rendered other services to the temple in addition to burying the dead. The parishes in question were unusual in that they quite often had to bury travellers, especially during epidemics or natural catastrophes, which was connected with the closeness of Cracow. At the turn of the 19th century cemeteries began to be moved further from human dwellings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".