MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991328683

Food paths, architecture and urban form. A case study

2011· dissertation· en· W6991328683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementArchitectureSubsistence agricultureSettlement (finance)ScarcityInterpretation (philosophy)Urban planningTypology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Architectural scholars have studied the origins, growth, and development of New World settlements and their works document aspects such as land division, infrastructure, construction materials and building techniques. Often overlooked, however, are the physical effects that everyday food-related activities had in shaping these places.This thesis explores the relationships that linked subsistence to the architecture of the cold-climate settlement of Montreal in seventeenth and eighteenth century New France. It investigates food production cycles and transformation processes, and seeks to reconstruct the spatial-temporal chains through which food made its way from field to table to wastes in a pre-industrial urban context. It does so, through introducing the concept of food paths. The correlation between food trajectories, the form of the settlement and its social structure are discussed through an investigation of areas dedicated to the production of cereals, meats and produce, their processing, consumption, storage and discharge. Methodologically, the scarcity of the relevant physical evidence, the fact that the interaction between food paths and architecture deals with several unknowns related to the timeframe, as well as the very perishable nature of food and the transient character of its trajectories pose major challenges that require an inter-disciplinary approach towards reconstructing related processes. Hence, this work seeks evidence from primary sources that include both iconographical data and manuscripts. Maps, travelersř notes, notariesř acts and archaeological data referring to landscape, urban form, architecture and artefacts also find their place in this study, in complementary roles.Among this dissertationřs original contributions is its interpretation of architecture and the development of a human settlement, by adding a new and complementary layer to morphological analysis. By examining and differentiating food paths, this work also creates a framework for the study of food and architecture that can be applied to cases across both time and space. Finally, it also contributes to understanding space beyond the paradigm of form and function and considers architecture as part of daily life processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207