MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991379754

A global compactness theorem for critical p-Laplace equations with weights

2020· dissertation· en· W6991379754 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompact spaceBounded functionSequence (biology)Class (philosophy)Extension (predicate logic)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let n ≥ 2, fix 1 < p < n, and let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded domain, with possibly non-smooth boundary, containing the origin.We investigate the compactness of Palais-Smale sequences for a class of critical p-Laplace equations with weights.More precisely, we establish a Struwe-type decomposition result for Palais-Smale sequences extending the recent result of to weighted equations.In sharp contrast to the model case of the critical p-Laplace equation, all bubbling must occur at the origin.Furthermore, we do not impose any smoothness assumptions on the boundary of Ω and our Palais-Smale sequence may be sign-changing.En tout premier lieu, je voudrais remercier mon superviseur, le professeur Jérôme Vétois, pour ses conseils, ses encouragements inébranlables et son appui indéfectible.Sans son soutien et les heures incalculables qu'il a consacré à répondre à mes nombreuses questions, cette thèse n'aurait pas été possible.Je voudrais aussi exprimer ma gratitude envers mon co-superviseur le professeur Pengfei Guan pour ses commentaires constructifs et tout le temps qu'il a investi dans ce travail.Je souhaiterais également remercier le professeur Guan, le professeur Vétois et le département de mathématiques et de statistique pour leur soutien financier.De plus, je suis très reconnaissant envers les nombreux professeurs et étudiants dont le travail acharné m'a encouragé à me surpasser.Surtout, je tiens à remercier Dana Berman pour des discussions utiles et ses suggestions pour l'organisation de ce travail.Enfin, je veux remercier mes parents pour leur amour et leur soutien infini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicNonlinear Partial Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207