MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991440894

The Grand trunk railway company of Canada.

2014· article· en· W6991440894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssertionGovernment (linguistics)PreferenceStatement (logic)Value (mathematics)LienOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the necessary consequences which must follow if relief, &c 67 The Northern Railway 68 Conclusion -69 Creditors, Messrs. Baring & Co., and Messrs. Glyn & Co.This Committee were aware at the time of the compilation of their report, that it would not find favor with the majority.The following statement in the report, from which I quote, confirms this view : "They have to state, however, that other First Preference Bondholders, acting independently of the Committee, have already taken the opinions of eminent counsel as regards the rights of First Preference Bondholders, and the remedies available.These parties have also forwarded instructions to Canada, with a view to an early assertion of their rights before the proper Court."This latter statement presents my first identification with, and engagement on behalf of the interests of the First Prefer- ence Bondholders.At the period referred to, I was instructed by Messrs. Ashurst, Son & Morris to take the necessary pro- ceedings on the part of the First Preference Bondholders referred to in the before-mentioned Report, for the purpose of Province.'In the same circular, the Act of 1856 was described as a concession by the Government of 1 the first charge on fhe undertaking, amounting to upwards of three millions sterling?The last para- graph of the circular is in these words: -' It has been before mentioned that these Debentures are to have priority of claim over the present first lien of the Province, and there cannot, therefore, be any DOUBT AS TO THEIR SECURITY AND VALUE AS AN INVEST-MENT.' *' In 1858, a further Relief Act was passed,* under which the Second Preference Bonds were issued for 1,111,- 500, being the balance of the Province's lien beyond the two millions First Preference Bonds. 41In a circular, dated 3rd March, 1859, signed by all the London Directors, and soliciting subscriptions for the Second Preference Bonds, the following state- ment appears: -'The sum of 3,111,500 has been raised on Bonds of the Province of Canada, the interest on which formed the first claim on the Rail- road.'In the same circular the Directors state that * the proposed new issue of 1,111,500 of Second * contingent increase up to Eight per Cent, on the 1 Share Capital of the Company.' 4. This

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207