← Back to cohort
Handcraft readymades ::ManualWork at the turn of the 20th Century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFermilabCalifornia State University, NorthridgeUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraGraduate CenterState University of New York at New PaltzFreie Universität BerlinConcordia UniversityUniversity of LimerickMassey UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity at AlbanyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthern Methodist UniversityHistorians of British ArtGeorgia Agricultural Experiment StationsSkidmore CollegeSaint Louis UniversityUniversity of TorontoWashington and Lee UniversityEastern Illinois UniversityUniversity of ExeterOxford Brookes UniversityMiddlesex UniversityUniversity of EssexOld Dominion UniversityFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityMontana State UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaTexas State UniversityFranklin and Marshall CollegeUniversity of Hawai'iCoastal Carolina UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of South FloridaMontclair State UniversityCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of WashingtonSan Francisco State UniversityBaylor UniversityCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of LeedsUniversity of DaytonHigh Point UniversityVillanova UniversityLoyola University ChicagoOhio State UniversityWake Forest UniversityAppalachian State UniversityEmory UniversityRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteQueen's UniversityUniversity of MiamiOregon State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaFairfield UniversityPurdue UniversityBrigham Young UniversityUniversity of MissouriRutgers, The State University of New JerseyUtah State UniversityFlorida State UniversityYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityBard Graduate Center, Bard CollegeTexas Christian UniversityUniversity of WollongongWayne State UniversityHarvard UniversityBard CollegeCenter for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of PittsburghSyracuse UniversityArizona State UniversityBrown UniversityYork UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisDaemen CollegeKennesaw State UniversityAmerican Council of Learned Societies
KeywordsTurn (biochemistry)Exposition (narrative)Action (physics)Government (linguistics)
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno