HUBUNGAN LAMA PENYINARAN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY TERHADAP JUMLAH BAKTERI STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The goal of endodontic treatment is to eliminate pathogenic bacteria which are the major problems in infected root canals so that can promote periapical healing. One of the mixed bacteria in root canal is Staphylococcus aureus which has been reported to occur more frequently in severe acute dental abscess. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the one of several technology that can eliminate microorganisms without causing injury to human normal cells. Different research using different device and bacteria has been reported to search the effect of irradiation time to the number of bacteria. Purpose: to know the relationship between the irradiation time of photodynamic therapy with the number of Staphylococcus aureus. Method: There are seven groups,which are control group, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 sec irradiation time. The bacteria which has been given the fotosensitizer and irradiation using Fotosan was incubation on nutrient agar for 48 hours. Then the bacteria was counted using Quebec Colony Counter and analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test. Result: The mean of group I (control group) is 119 CFU/ml, group II is 29 CFU/ml, group III is 20 CFU/ml, group IV is 13 CFU/ml, group V is 7 CFU/ml, group VI and VII are nothing. Conclusion:The longer irradiation time can decrease the number of Staphylococcus aureus and at 50 seconds irradiation can kill all Staphylococcus aureus
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".