IMPACT: Health and Welfare Division: report 2002-2003.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPACT members gave a massive endorsement to the Sustaining Progress national deal \nin March 2003, when they backed it by 9-1 in a national bailout entitled all workers to \npay increases worth a total of seven per cent in the first 18 months of the agreement. In \n2004, further cost-of-living increases, worth 5.5 per cent to workers earning more than \n€351 a week, and six per cent to those earning less, were negotiated for the second half \nof the three year deal, which runs until June 2006. \nAs part of Sustaining Progress, the Govemment also agreed to fully implement the \nrecommendations of the Public Service Benchmarking Body, which delivered additional \naverage pay increases of 8.9 per cent. Three quarters of the benchmarking awards have \nnow been sanctioned and the final quarter is due in June 2005. \nOverall, Sustaining Progress delivered cost of living increases of over 13 per cent plus \nbenchmarking payments worth an average of 8.9 per cent, over a three-year period. In \n2003, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions backed IMPACT's position that staff in the \ncommunity and voluntary sector should enjoy the same pay and conditions as staff doing \nsimilar work in the mainstream public service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it