MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991703246

Indian and British Women’s Contributions to Modern Theatre in Punjab: 1830s -1940s

2023· article· en· W6991703246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyScholarshipEliteAmateurColonialismScrutinyHistoricity (philosophy)Social history (medicine)Manu
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of histories and treatises on modern Punjabi theatre indicates a conspicuous absence of women as playwrights, directors, and performers. Countering the claims of critics and historians that women did not participate in theatre until 1941, this thesis shows that Indian and British women have been fostering and nourishing folk and modern theatre in Punjab. Pursuing the scholarship of Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid, who impress upon the need to interrogate the historicity of constructing women’s subordinate position, this thesis examines the contributions of elite and working-class British women such as Emily Eden, Flora Annie Steel, and Norah Richards, and courtesans, kanjari, and ordinary women from Punjab whose social “respectability” was and continues to be defined by kinship and social lenses.\nThrough an “agnotological” approach, I examine the patriarchal framework of theatre historiography that silences and erases women’s contributions, and simultaneously retrieves women’s participation and production of multiple forms of theatre. In this regard, I analyze the works of Norah Richards, the “grand matriarch” of modern Punjabi theatre, who founded the tradition of dramatic competitions in colleges, wrote and directed drama, and formulated the naturalistic rural Punjabi theatre theory. Additionally, I examine reformist, colonialist, and nationalist imaginings that shaped social attitudes and perceptions about female performers, such as courtesans, as morally debasing the social fabric of Punjab. This is evaluated through the scrutiny of colonial caste-based stratifications of performers and notions of social respectability that women in private and public spaces experience and negotiate. As well, I analyze travel writing to understand how British women’s amateur theatre activities in Shimla and Dalhousie, Parsi travelling companies, and dramatic and theatrical activities of missionaries and Temperance Associations in the late nineteenth century shaped the public sphere of theatre in Punjab. Finally, I analyze Giddha as a form of folk theatre that provides women with an alternative space where they can express themselves freely through hybrid performances and engage in political and social activism alongside enriching theatre in Punjab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0170.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207