Implementing Strategy to Practice when Energy Crisis Arises : Single Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of strategy as practice suggests that a company's strategy involves not only top management's vision or plan, but also the collective practices of all employees. This theo-ry highlights the role of daily actions and routines in shaping and reinforcing a company's strategy and emphasizes the importance of aligning the strategy with employees' experi-ences for success. By focusing on aligning organizational practices with the strategy, a company can embed the strategy into its practices and sustain its success over time. This case study aims to examine the implementation of a new strategy by a company fol-lowing an acquisition and during an energy crisis, and how different levels within the company perceive its success. The research analyzes the opinions and views of each level of the organization towards the implementation of the strategy and evaluates its effec-tiveness in meeting its objectives. The focus of the study is to determine the success of the company in effectively implementing the strategy in practice. The findings suggest that the company's departure from its strategy resulted in communi-cation, commitment, and resource conflicts. The study highlights the importance of focus-ing on aligning organizational practices with the strategy to ensure its success, through clear communication, maintaining commitment, and providing adequate resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".