The Inuit Circumpolar Council – agent of peacemaking for Inuit in Nunavut and Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation analyzes the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) as a peacemaking tool in conflicts around climate change for Inuit in Nunavut/ Canada and Greenland. Climate change, a form of colonialism, exposes Inuit to conditions of structural violence. Processes of decolonization are needed for conflict transformation (CT). The question of whether the ICC is an agent of peacemaking was approached from two perspectives: the ICC/ international perspectives and the community/ local perspectives. This qualitative research is aligned with an Inuit research paradigm that is based on Inuit knowledge. It involved observation, content analysis, and quantitative surveys. The main research method was conversation (with ICC representatives from Greenland and Canada and with local Inuit from Maniitsoq/ Greenland and Panniqtuuq/ Nunavut). Decolonization as both processes of assimilation into the dominant structure and processes of resistance against the dominant structure is reflected in the Hybrid Peace model that incorporates local/ Indigenous conflict resolution approaches with imported/ Western peacemaking tools. This study’s first key finding is that the ICC is an agent of Hybrid Peacemaking for Inuit in conflicts related to climate change because it combines pre-contact Inuit forms of conflict resolution rooted in Inuit knowledge (e.g. working collaboratively toward a common goal, pragmatism, conflict avoidance, and public conflict resolution) with typical Western conflict resolution mechanisms (e.g. establishing a non-governmental organization, dealing with political decision-makers, and actively co-creating the international political level to enhance the voice of Inuit). The second key finding is that there is a rich array of Everyday Peacemaking processes in both communities, wherein local Inuit have realized innovative and creative ways of coping with their daily challenges by sharing time with each other, developing and maintaining relationships, active listening, entertaining, and healing by being in nature. The third key finding reveals that the theory of a two-way knowledge exchange between the ICC and local Inuit needs to be more extensively further put into practice: local perceptions of the ICC illustrated the NGO’s importance but also a lack of knowledge about its work among local Inuit. To deal with this issue, the intermediaries between the communities on the local level and the ICC on the international level need to be studied further.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".