MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991790931

Incidencia de los programas deportivos de la televisión lojana, en la divulgación de aspectos científicos y tecnológicos de la fisiología del ejercicio, durante el primer trimestre del año 2010. Lineamientos alternativos

2015· article· en· W6991790931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports and Physical Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)DisseminationScientific fieldScientific literatureSociology of scientific knowledge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research entitled: Impact of television sports programs lojana, in disseminating scientific and technological aspects of exercise physiology, during the first quarter of 2010. Alternative guidelines, performs a comprehensive analysis of the two sports programs have lojana television, with special enfasisen disseminating scientific and technological aspects of exercise physiology. \n \nInformation provided then interpreted and tabulated that provided the application of the techniques of survey and interview, in which the habitues of the programs, that is, the audience overwhelmingly believes that these topics are not scientific and technological part of the agenda of issuance of daily programs studied, except a small part of the sample, through their confusion, believes that these issues are indeed addressed. \n \nAfter field research, direct observation and in light of the procedures of the scientific method, up to important research findings among which are: the absence in the programs “UV Deportes” and “Deportivo 22” specific segments related to the dissemination of scientific and technological aspects of exercise physiology, and, more worryingly, the existence of a significant gap in knowledge of this subject, the personnel who manage, lead, produces and performs the aforementioned programs. \n \nTherefore, these television sports programs lojana, not contribute to knowledge regarding the benefits and care that should be considered during the development of the planned exercise. To this end, as a corollary, we propose some alternative guidelines that will lead to the implementation, in the sports program that it deems, in a series of reports with a duration of between three to five minutes, in which these issues are addressed in a clear, simple, direct, understandable to the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicSports and Physical Education Studies→French-language works237,207→