MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991804612

The incidence rate and determinants of thrombotic occlusion of power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters at the WRHA community intravenous infusion clinics in Winnipeg, Manitoba

2020· dissertation· en· W6991804612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcclusionIncidence (geometry)Peripherally inserted central catheterComplicationRetrospective cohort studyCohortThrombosisCatheter
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Power-injectable (PI) peripherally inserted catheters (PICCs) have been used frequently in community settings as they provide a reliable central venous access to infuse intravenous infusates. However, these catheters can occlude. Thrombotic occlusion is the most frequent complication of PICCs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the incidence rate and the determinants of PI PICCs at the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) Community IV Program (CIVP) IV Infusion Clinics in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts housed in Accuro Electronic Medical Record at the WRHA CIVP IV Infusion Clinics. Survival analysis methods were used to analyze data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between thrombotic occlusion and certain socio-demographic, clinical, insertion and PI PICC-related characteristics. The incidence rate of thrombotic PI PICC occlusion was 32 per 1,000 person-weeks (95% CI: 25-43). After adjusting for IV antimicrobials, ambulatory drug delivery pump use, the tip location of PI PICCs, and the number of PI PICC lumens, the hazard of thrombotic occlusion for those PI PICCs which received IV vancomycin was 5.8 times greater (95% CI: 2.8-12.3). The hazard of thrombotic occlusion was 5.1 times greater (95 % CI: 2.8-9.1) when multiple-lumen PI PICCs used. To reduce the incidence rate of thrombotic occlusion, single-lumen PI PICCs should be used whenever possible. Heparin lock may be used to lock multiple-lumen PI PICCs and when IV vancomycin is infused. Further research with a greater sample size is needed to validate the findings of this study. Keywords: power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters, thrombotic occlusion, withdrawal occlusion, community-based IV infusion clinic, infusion nursing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→