MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991821269

INTEGRATING REMOTE DIGITAL TOOLS INTO POST-PANDEMIC GEOLOGIC FIELDWORK TO EFFECTIVELY DISSEMINATE CONTENT DELIVERY AND ASSIST IN OVERALL UNDERSTANDING OF VARIOUS GEOLOGIC PHENOMENA: SUMMER 2022 FIELD MAPPING EXERCISES

2022· other· en· W6991821269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisseminationSoftware deploymentGeologic mapAdaptation (eye)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTEGRATING REMOTE DIGITAL TOOLS INTO POST-PANDEMIC GEOLOGIC FIELDWORK TO EFFECTIVELY DISSEMINATE CONTENT DELIVERY AND ASSIST IN OVERALL UNDERSTANDING OF VARIOUS GEOLOGIC PHENOMENA: SUMMER 2022 FIELD MAPPING EXERCISES SHAMI, Malek, BETHEL, Cherise, NUNEZ, Eddy, RAYHAN, Salam, KHANDAKER, Nazrul and CABAROY, Charren C. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol 54, No. 5, https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2022AM-379779 SHAMI, Malek1, BETHEL, Cherise2, NUNEZ, Eddy3, RAYHAN, Salam3, KHANDAKER, Nazrul2 and CABAROY, Charren C.1, (1)Geology Discipline, AC-2F09, York College of CUNY, 9420 Guy R. Brewer Blvd., Jamaica, NY 11451, (2)Geology Discipline, York College of CUNY, 9420 Guy R Brewer Blvd, AC-2F09, Jamaica, NY 11451-0001, (3)School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, CUNY Queens College, . 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367 In the summer of 2020, a case study titled “Integrating Digital Tools in Remote Learning to Enhance the Delivery Methods of Technical Content in Undergraduate Geosciences” was virtually presented at the GSA annual meeting (initially scheduled in Montreal, Canada). The primary objective concerning the usage of digital tools was to highlight the abrupt COVID-19 induced transition to remote learning, the subsequent impact on geologic fieldwork, and the deployment of new digital tools as an adaptation to the unprecedented change in the learning environment. Here, authors discuss integrating such digital tools and lessons learned from geologic fieldwork conducted during the pandemic into the post-pandemic geologic field investigation. The summer 2022 Geologic Field Mapping Course (capstone course) conducted in Rosendale, Ulster County, NY, involved lower to mid Paleozoic complexly folded siliciclastic and carbonates and was taught by adhering to pre-pandemic standards. Students from both the City University of New York (CUNY) York College and CUNY Queens College had the opportunity to camp in the field using facility provided by North-South Lake for the entire duration of the course. Accommodation near the point of interest was possible largely due to easing of social distancing protocols and being closer to Rosendale, enabled students to inspect outcrops for field data collection. Digital tools carried over from the 2020-2021 pandemic era included the employment of a 5G Internet Hotspot, a miniprojector, and the use of various remote software such as DPlot, Sedlog, ArcPro GIS, and Google Earth. Pertinent lithologic and structural data were plotted to draw cross-sections, correlate outcrops/units, and decipher depositional environments of the exposed sedimentary rocks. The outcomes of this recently concluded field mapping exercises demonstrate that integrating lessons learned and utilization of digital tools not only optimize geologic fieldwork, rather, it also enhances the efficiency of statistically analyzing data, making real time decisions in the field, and correlating various findings to previously published academic literature. Access to 5G Internet Hotspot in remote setting became very effective in terms allowing students to gather peer-reviewed geologic information and minimize the knowledge gap, if any. Sunday, 9 October 2022: 9:00 AM-1:00 PM Exhibit Hall F (Colorado Convention Center)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)Same topicFacial Trauma and Fracture ManagementFrench-language works237,207