MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991902242

Insects of alfalfa in Manitoba with particular reference to Lygus spp., Adelphocoris lineolatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) and their natural enemies

2005· dissertation· en· W6991902242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcyrthosiphon pisumLygusInsectPEST analysisAphidSitobion avenaePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study was conducted from 1999 to 2001 to determine the most suitable method to be used for sampling insect pests on alfalfa, to determine the seasonal occurrence of common insect pests and natural enemies, to assess the roles of common natural enemies on insect pests, and to find out ways to increase the benefits from insect natural enemies in relation to the production practices of alfalfa in Manitoba. Among different sampling methods, sweep-net sampling was found to be the most consistent and reliable method of sampling most insect taxa, although beat tray sampling provided better estimates for Lygus spp. nymphs. It was found in the present study that Lygus spp. Hahn, Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze) and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) were the most prevalent insect pests. Carabids, chrysopids, coccinellids, Nabis spp., Orius spp., spiders and opilionids were the most commonly occurring predaceous taxa. Circumstantial evidence from the field study and evidence from the laboratory study indicate that coccinellids play important roles in population growth of the above pests on alfalfa. Field and laborarory studies also provided evidence that carabids, coccinellids, chrysopids and nabids alone or together as a guild can suppress these pest populations on alfalfa. Parasitoids appeared to be important, as they killed a considerable percentage of Lygus spp. and A. pisum, but not of A. lineolatus. Aphidius ervi Haliday was the most prevalent aphid parasitoid. No control measures were required in hay fields, as swathing hay suppressed pest populations below damaging levels, partly through causing Lygus spp., and sometimes A. lineolatus, to move into adjacent seed fields. Conversely, insect pests were more numerous in seed fields, although these fields usually received chemical insecticides as pest control measures. Whether populations of natural enemies can be enhanced in seed alfalfa fields was examined, and it was found that nepetalactone, which is an aphid sex pheromone component, can be used to enhance natural enemy populations, and the benefits thereof, in seed fields. Successful rearing of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) and Chrysopa oculata Say larvae by using Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (leafcutting bee) prepupae as the chrysopid larval diet expanded the use of leafcutting bees and provided a basis for inexpensive culture of chrysopids. The potential of insect pests and their natural enemies for management in connection with the current alfalfa production practices are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→French-language works237,207→