MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992041649

Investigating biopesticides for the control of cabbage stem flea beetle (Psylliodes chrysocephala)

2024· dissertation· en· W6992041649 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHarper Adams University Repository (GuildHE Research) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaHealth and Safety ExecutiveUniversity of WarwickHarper Adams University
KeywordsSpinosadPopulationNuisancePyrethrumNucleofectionContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cabbage stem flea beetle (CSFB, Psylliodes chrysocephala, L.) is an economically important pest of oilseed rape crops in the UK and the rest of Europe. This pest was controlled through the use of neonicotinoid seed dressings until they were placed under a moratorium and subsequently banned by the European Union in 2013 and 2018, respectively. In response, oilseed rape growers initially increased their reliance on foliar applications of pyrethroid insecticides to control CSFB, which led to the increase of resistance to this type of insecticides
\nin CSFB populations. There is then an urgent need for growers to find alternative effective solutions to control CSFB in oilseed rape crops.
\nThis study aimed to investigate the potential of biopesticides to effectively control CSFB in oilseed rape crops. A review of the knowledge on CSFB and related flea beetle control is
\npresented in Chapter 1. A range of methods to effectively rear CSFB under laboratory conditions are presented in Chapter 2. The efficacy of fatty acids, entomopathogenic fungi, entomopathogenic bacteria, the botanical insecticide zadirachtin and pyrethroid insecticides, under laboratory conditions is investigated in Chapter 3. Chapter 3 also investigated the potential of adjuvants to improve the persistence of fatty acids on oilseed rape leaves. Fatty
\nacids and entomopathogenic fungi were found to significantly increase CSFB adult mortality but entomopathogenic bacteria and azadirachtin were not effective. The potential of various
\nspecies of entomopathogenic nematodes to control CSFB adults under laboratory conditions is investigated in Chapter 4. All nematode species significantly increased CSFB mortality
\ncompared to a water control. The potential of the biopesticides tested in Chapters 3 and 4 under field conditions is tested in Chapter 5. However, here none of the biopesticides tested
\nwere found to significantly reduce CSFB feeding damage on oilseed rape leaves or larval numbers. A sentiment analysis of the UK farming press before and after the neonicotinoid insecticides moratorium is presented in Chapter 6. Finally, the key findings from this study are discussed more broadly to reflect the international effort to combat this pest in Chapter 7. The overall aim of this study, which was to evaluate the potential of biopesticides to control CSFB, was met in terms of laboratory testing. However, more work is needed to confirm whether biopesticides are a viable option as part of an Integrated Pest Management programme to control CSFB in oilseed rape crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarper Adams University Repository (GuildHE Research)Same topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207