Kinerja Bakteri Anammox Candidatus Brocadia fulgida dalam Penyisihan Amonium Nitrat Nitrit pada suhu 30°C dan 35°C Menggunakan Reaktor Up-Flow Anaerobik Sludge Blanket (UASB)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kinerja penyisihan amonium, nitrat, dan nitrit oleh bakteri Candidatus Brocadia fulgida yang berasal dari Muara Panjalinan, Kota Padang, Indonesia. Reaktor up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) dioperasikan dan dialiri substrat secara kontinu pada suhu 30°C dan 35°C dengan lama pengoperasian masing-masing terbagi atas dua periode selama 30 hari. Periode pertama berlangsung pada hari ke-1 hingga ke-15 dan periode kedua berlangsung pada hari ke-16 hingga ke-30. Substrat mengandung konsentrasi amonium dan nitrit masing-masing ±100 mg-N/L dengan hydraulic retention time (HRT) 6 jam. Kinerja penyisihan nitrogen dihitung berdasarkan konsentrasi influen dan efluen amonium, nitrit, dan nitrat yang diukur menggunakan spektorofotometri UV-Vis. Kinerja penyisihan nitrogen dengan parameter NLR, NRR, ACE dan NRE pada periode pertama berturut-turut didapatkan nilai rata-rata 0,465 kg-N/m3.h; 0,287 kg-N/m3.h, 62% dan 78%. Pada periode kedua berturut didapatkan nilai rata-rata kinerja penyisihan 0,460 kg-N/m3.h; 0,353 kg-N/m3.h, 77%, dan 78%. Hasil penelitian ini mendapatkan kinerja penyisihan amonium, nitrat, dan nitrit optimum oleh bakteri anammox pada pengoperasian periode kedua dengan grafik efisiensi penyisihan nitrogen yang lebih stabil. \n \nKata kunci: anammox, UASB, penyisihan nitrogen, temperatur 30°C, temperatur 35°C
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".