MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992256126

La demanda global y los ingresos tributarios en el periodo post pandemia 2020 - 2021

2023· dissertation· en· W6992256126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTax revenueRevenueConsumption (sociology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Value (mathematics)Correlation coefficientGini coefficient
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The different economic postulates maintain that economic growth must necessarily lead to an increase in tax collection, unless the levels of informality are very high. The current doctoral thesis carries out an investigation to determine the relationship between global demand and tax income in the post-pandemic period 2020 - 2021. For this purpose, this Quantitative type, Correlational level and non-experimental design. The research concludes that Global Demand is directly related to Tax Revenue in the post-pandemic period 2020 - 2021, demonstrated with the Correlation Coefficient r = 0.861502676; and the Coefficient of Determination R2 = 0.752186860. Likewise, it has been verified that the Internal Demand determines the behavior of the Global Demand, having obtained a Correlation Coefficient r = 0.998999691; and the Coefficient of Determination R2 = 0.998000382. On the other hand, the value of Internal Demand is determined by the behavior of Private Final Consumption Expenditure, a concept that reached the amount of S/. 677,602.00 million, equal to 63.76% of the total. The analysis of Tax Revenues shows that these had a growing evolution in general terms, with the exception of the II quarter of 2020 where there was a contraction of -23.68%, because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207