«La marque du maître»: Messiaen's influence on Québécois composers Serge Garant, Clermont Pépin and André Prévost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation examines the influence of Olivier Messiaen upon three Québécois composers: Serge Garant (1929-1986), Clermont Pépin (1926-2006) and André Prévost (1934-2001). While the three developed different musical styles, their compositional techniques have much in common, which I attribute, in part, to the influence of their teacher. My thesis shows that this influence is most evident in the works written during and immediately after the three composers' studies with Messiaen. I compare and contrast techniques used by the three Québécois composers with Messiaen's own compositional devices. My analyses draw upon information from compositional sketches housed in archives in Montréal and Ottawa, program notes and prefaces to scores, the composers' self-analyses, and most importantly, their recollections about their experiences with their teacher. Garant's work most closely resembled that of Messiaen and he employed the greatest number of his techniques, but only for a very short time. Pépin employed the smallest number of his teacher's techniques, but was directly inspired by them, especially by the modes of limited transposition, throughout the first half of his career. Prévost represented a middleground between Garant and Pépin. Of the three, he was the most concerned with notions of symmetryâthe guiding premise behind much of Messiaen's compositional languageâand its manifestation in every structural level of his music.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".