MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992341925

Learning Ecologies: Connecting Social Constructivism and Distance Learning

2022· dissertation· en· W6992341925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Environments and Student Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructivist teaching methodsSocial constructivismConstructivism (international relations)Synchronous learningCurriculumAsynchronous learningDistance educationExperiential learningReflexivity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social constructivist teaching practices are understood to foster deep learning through socio-cultural interactions, asserting that individual learning is limited in comparison to what can be learned as a community. Social constructivist principles are embedded within Saskatchewan curricula with little mention of how that might be achieved in asynchronous distance learning. The lack of direct connections places a burden on distance learning teachers, policymakers, and course designers to discover how to actualize social constructivist education practices, within an asynchronous learning environment. This mixed methods study used an online survey and semi-structured interviews to understand teachers’ experiences with social constructivist practices in high school asynchronous distance learning within Saskatchewan. \nThrough the reflexive thematic analysis of the semi-structured interviews and the open-ended survey questions, three themes were constructed. The “Teacher as Catalyst” theme identified the dynamic role that teachers take on to be responsive to student learning needs (e.g., creating flexible learning paths, increasing resources, and strengthening relationships). The theme “Student Agency” represents two key teacher perspectives regarding students’ reluctance to take part in collaborative learning with peers. Namely, student readiness and student buy-in. The final theme, “Alignment of Purpose, Pedagogy, and Person” depicts how the learning ecosystem influences pedagogical decisions and the learning experiences of students.\nThe findings support the integral role of student-teacher relationships to support learning and suggest that under the right conditions, the intent and stance of the Saskatchewan curricula can be achieved in asynchronous distance learning environments provided there is an alignment in purpose, pedagogy, and person. However, the research findings did not support a strong student desire for social constructivist practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.077
Scholarly communication0.0210.023
Open science0.0030.021
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicEducational Environments and Student OutcomesFrench-language works237,207