MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992539961

Marginalization of social work practice with ethno-racial minorities in mainstream human service organizations in a Canadian setting : a critical exploratory study of systemic issues

2010· dissertation· en· W6992539961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamSocial workThematic analysisExploratory researchQualitative researchHuman servicesDialogicParticipatory action researchEmpowerment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis is a qualitative study from critical theory perspectives to enhance
\nunderstanding of how systemically mainstream organizations marginalize social work
\npractice with ethno-racial minorities. It also explores strategic implications for systemic
\nchange based on field research findings. Ten social workers from Edmonton – the
\nprovincial capital city of Alberta, Canada - participated in investigative dialogues for the
\nthesis field research. These research participants’ workplace stories lend themselves to
\nexplore three questions: what does marginalization of practice with ethno-racial
\nminorities look like in mainstream organizational settings; what is there to understand
\nabout it as a systemic issue and what the research findings imply for change strategies.
\nA critical analysis of dialogic data thematically identifies everyday work issues
\nthat describe how practice with ethno-racial minorities is kept at the operational and
\nservice-delivery fringe of individual workplaces. These thematic findings point to
\nbroader issues of the mainstream human service organization sector. These broader
\nissues further highlight how the practice marginalization of concern in this thesis is a
\nsystemically constructed issue. These broader issues are mainstream benevolence, social
\nwork as an employment regime, multicultural service delivery as a thrill and clientization
\nof ethno-racial minorities.
\nIn consideration of these sector-wide issues, implied change strategies reveal
\nthree thematic directions for systemic transformational change: (i) continued dialoguing
\ninvolving concerned social workers and ethno-racial minority community leaders, (ii)
\ncommunity social work to build and foster coalitionary activist work and organizations,
\nand (iii) participatory research involving a community sharing concern of the practice
\nmarginalization issue so as to build a strong knowledge-base to support and empower broad-base activist endeavour to effect change about mainstream human service
\norganizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)Same topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207