Letter to the congregation of St. Matthew's Chapel, Quebec; in answer to the Rev. Dr. Percy's letter on "Tractarianism".
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
charges of Tractarianism and Romanizing tendencies and practices which he brought forward against some of his brethren of the clergy in a platform speech on the 25th February last.The par- ticular charges made in that speech, however, he, in this letter, only alludes to in a general way, as " having expressed his belief that Tractarian principles were being disseminated by certain in- dividuals in this Diocese."To " substantiate the charges then made, to establish the allegations offered," he passes them by in silence.To prove me a " modern innovator, an introducer of Oxford novelties," he brings up a tract written nearly 200 years ago, and circulated by the Society that published it ever since !This is certainly a strange mode of vindicating his truthfulness.Why then does he adopt it ?Evidently because he knows his former charges to be groundless; and not having the manliness openly to acknowledge his error, he hopes to cover his retreat from the old ground with the brisk fire he opens upon the new enemy, and that, in the dust and noise he excites about it, his former libel will escape detection.This example I must beg to decline copying ; and before pass- ing on to examine his new grievance, I must say a few words about the original attack itself.Dr. Percy is reported to have said, (Mercury of 27th
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it