Louise MELANÇON, L 'avortement dans une société pluraliste, Éditions Paulines, Montréal 1993, 166 pp., 12, 5 x 19. [RECENSIÓN]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESEÑAS les no solemnes, que pueden, en el futuro, verse modificadas, según exijan las circunstancias pastorales.Debajo de toda esta discusión, que a veces toma acentos ásperos, late la cuestión de la Humanae vitae: el disenso con el Magisterio para la reflexión teológica no es una cuestión puramente formal, sino la lucha por aceptar o no la incorrección de ciertas acciones en el campo de la sexualidad matrimonial (la contracepción hormonal).McCormick no considera que la libertad del teólogo cristiano es la libertad qua Christus nos liberavit, y no la libertad indeterminada de la democracia estadounidense.Como consecuencia, no parece entender que la aceptación de corazón de las afirmaciones magisteriales, aun las no solemnes, es liberación, y no coacción intelectual.La ' segunda parte se dedica a examinar, entre otras, cuestiones tan variadas como la aceptación a los sacramentos de las parejas divorciadas y vueltas a casar, cuestiones suscitadas por el corazón artificial, la tecnología de manipulación genética, la esterilización en hospitales católicos, la homosexualidad, el SIDA, la tecnología de la reproducción, la nutrición e hidratación de los pacientes terminales, y la actitud del médico ante la sexualidad activa en adolescentes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".