"Lincoln County, Montana, Community Wildfire Protection Plan"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Class 6-Ignition 7-Crown Fire Potential 8-Population Density 9-County Fire Districts 10-County Fire Stations 11-Airfields 1 Lincoln County Community Wildfire Protection Plan ▪ A process for maintenance of the plan which includes monitoring and evaluation of mitigation activities ▪ Signatures to document that the plan has been formally adopted by the involved agencies 2 Lincoln County Community Wildfire Protection PlanThe Community Lincoln County is a large, generally forested area situated in the northwest corner of Montana.The terrain is fairly rugged with the Cabinet Range to the south and the Selkirk Range to the west.Elevations vary from 1800' near Troy (the lowest point in Montana) to 8700' in the Cabinet Range.A central geological feature of the county is the Kootenai River which flows south out of British Columbia near Eureka and exits the county below Troy.Due to the influence of the Pacific weather system the climate is mild and moist compared to the rest of the state.Many of the same tree and plant species found in the Pacific Northwest are found in portions of Lincoln County.Average annual precipitation varies from 18" to 25" near Libby and Troy to only 14" in the Tobacco Valley near Eureka.The trees, plants and grasses found in this northern part of the county are more representative of areas in eastern Montana.Higher average annual precipitation amounts are found in higher elevations.Some of these areas have precipitation amounts of over 70" a year.The wettest months are November through January and the driest are June through September. Lincoln County Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.133 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".