Memorial Stained-Glass Window Selected Profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hospital's Memorial-Stained Glass Window remains today a bright centerpiece to the heart of our hospital's history.Stop and take a closer look at the window on your way to the Chapel or the Edward A. Block Family Library; the intricate designs of 120 individual stained-glass panels will take your breath away every time just to think about what you are looking atgenerations of people and organizations believing in and supporting the work of our hospital to care for all children.The window, officially unveiled on December 27, 1927 by Hugh McK Landon and James W. Fesler, leaders of the Riley Memorial Association (now the Riley Children's Foundation), began its mission from that time on to recognize and honor the memories of individuals, families, and organizations donating to the hospital.Each stained-glass panel tells a different story, some of heartbreak and loss, some of a desire to honor the memory of a loved one, all with the hope that no matter what, they were giving to do good for children who were patients at Riley Hospital for Children.Here are just a few of those stories:Elizabeth Sinclair (about 1773-1849), was the grandmother to William Fortune, one of the twenty-one Incorporators for the James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association in April 1921.William Fortune founded the Indianapolis Chapter of the American Red Cross and was a successful businessman who once headed 12 independent telephone companies and actually made the first dial telephone call.He purchased the home from the estate of Magdalena Holstein where James Whitcomb Riley lived on Lockerbie Street when Mrs. Holstein
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.708 | 0.372 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".