From mine-face to micron-scale investigation of the Cretaceous McMurray Formation at Kearl Mine, northeastern Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
River meander-belt morphodynamics are critical to understanding fluvial sedimentology, however, the process-to-product relationships are highly complex. To improve understanding of meander belt heterogeneity and depositional processes this thesis investigates the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation at Kearl mine, northeastern Alberta. The research objectives are to i) utilize extensive mine-face exposures by integrating them with related borehole data to reconstruct the local paleoenvironment, ultimately interpreting the paleochannel morphodynamic evolution through time; and ii) investigate fluvial mudstone microstructure of point-bar mudstones from Kearl mine using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The area of interest at Kearl mine is a 1.9 x 1.1 km area where mine-faces were excavated while on-site geologists documented notable geologic features. A focus of the study is the atypical channel-belt deposit trends observed in one of the documented point bars. The atypical point-bar deposits comprise inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS) that was interspersed with mudstone clast breccias and mudstone-lined trough cross-bedded sandstone. The deposits were localized in a segment of the point bar that did not conform to upward- nor downstream-fining trends in typical point-bar models. To better understand these peculiar deposits, this research produces and utilizes a planform reconstruction to investigate the fluvial processes that occurred during the atypical deposition, noting that the upstream cutbank material was mudstone-rich and may have influenced the atypical point-bar heterogeneity. Furthermore, a mudstone sampled downstream from the atypical deposits is analyzed with SEM to observe microstructure characteristics, which reveals evidence of sub-mm-sized mudstone aggregates. The presence of these micron-scale mudstone aggregates implies that a broader range of hydrodynamic conditions should be considered for fluvial mudstone deposition, particularly the mudstone component of point-bar IHS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".