MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992953134

Miss Canada. Is Canada a land of sunshine or snow?.

2014· article· en· W6992953134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaLiquationDiafiltrationEmperipolesisTriacetinDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andthe velvet peach in its swaying" nest fills the gardener with delight.She can pluck, if she will, at Yule tide, in the balmy air. the rose, And the people smile when they hear her called ;t Our Lady of the Snows."The wire that brought that message on lightning under the sea Had been too short to bear it to her furthest boundary.Not by a flippant phrasing of catchword verse or prose.Can the truth be told of the vast domain of " Our Lady of the Snows."-Arthur Weir, in ,; Montreal Star."CSanaMan ^rofcucts, ESIDES an immense Export trade in Flour, Cheese, Butter, Eggs, and Canned Fish, all of > >-s-® which are well-known in England, Canada grows a large quantity of Fruit.Canadian Apples are now very much appreciated, and her Peaches, Plums, Pears, and Berries are equally nice.Not only so, but a large trade is now being done in Canned Tomatoes, Peas, French Beans, and other vegetables -indeed, there seems no limit to the possibilities of development in this direction.Canadian Beef, Mutton, Bacon, Hams, and Poultry are so like English, being fed as on our own English farms, that very few know the difference.And why should they care ?Are not our Canadian brothers as British as we are, and their produce equal to our own ]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4180.131

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207