MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6993004512

Non-perturbative resummation in three dimensional Yang-Mills theory

2014· dissertation· en· W6993004512 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsResummationObservableScalar (mathematics)Higgs bosonGauge theoryEffective field theoryScalar field theoryQuantum field theoryBeta function (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An n-particle-irreducible (nPI) effective action Gamma[phi, G, ...] is a functional whose stationary points coincide with the exact Green's functions of a quantum theory (for n=2 this is known as a Phi-derivable approximation). Any practical application would necessitate a truncation of Gamma at some finite loop order; then, the stationary points of Gamma[phi, G, ...] would correspond to a selective resummation to all orders in a perturbative expansion. This thesis explores the application of these functional techniques to non-abelian gauge theory in three spacetime dimensions.3D gauge theories are physically relevant in that they provide an effective description of the non-perturbative sectors of high temperature 4D gauge theories. In this work we focus our attention on two particular 3D models, pure SU(N) Yang-Mills and Yang-Mills coupled to a scalar field. In our study of pure Yang-Mills theory we address the technical and computational challenges associated with the resolution of the three-loop 3PI equations of motion; in the end obtaining solutions for the fully resummed two and three-point functions of the theory. Subsequently, the study of SU(N) Higgs theory is physically motivated, in that this field theory provides a framework which can be used to compute gauge-invariant observables using the nPI method. In determining the phase diagram of SU(N) Higgs theory (specifically in the three-loop 2PI formalism) we address the overall accuracy and applicability of these methods to the non-perturbative study of Yang-Mills theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→