MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6993011412

Nolite te bastardes carborundorum: discursos, poderes e resistências em The handmaid’s tale

2022· dissertation· en· W6993011412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaTheocracyPower (physics)NarrativeResistance (ecology)State (computer science)Relation (database)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The handmaid's tale (or O conto da aia, in a Brazilian version) is an American television series of great success in Brazil. Based on the novel of the same name by canadian writer Margaret Atwood, originally published in 1985, the production was released in 2017 by the streaming service Hulu and presents a dystopian narrative that takes place in Gilead: a fictional place located in what would be the territory of the United States and where, after a coup d'état, a theocratic revolution is promoted. In the plot, which has already spanned four seasons (and which has been renewed for the fifth), Gilead presents a historical urgency linked to the low birth rate, a justification from which an entire device of power is organized – around the theocratic State – which not only takes rights away from women in general, but also sexually enslaves fertile women. Starting from this scenario and making use of photograms, this research has the objective of mapping the practices of power and resistance present, mainly, in the first season of the series, concretized within the device that organizes the relations of force in the narrative. It will therefore be a matter of identifying how such relationships are exercised over the bodies and lives of the characters, through technologies and techniques of sovereignty, disciplines and biopolitics. But beyond that, it will also be a matter of analyzing how such power relations produce places of resistance that emerge in social microspheres. As a theoretical-methodological contribution, we use the Foucaultian Discourse Analysis articulated with the discussion undertaken by Frédéric Gros (2018) around a stylistics of (dis)obedience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it