MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6993035789

The North American Indigenous People Nuu-chah-nulth : Religious Practices and Beliefs

2024· article· en· W6993035789 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumstantial evidenceContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)Government (linguistics)PopulationIndigenous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This compilation thesis, “The North American Indigenous People Nuu-chah-nulth: Religious Practices and Beliefs”, examines how the traditional language, as well as the social and political systems of the Native American Nuu-chah-nulth people, function and are employed today, alongside their traditional beliefs and ritual practices. The thesis is based on extensive fieldwork and interviews, and highlights their accounts concerning the preservation and revitalization of these traditions. It explores the forms of traditional beliefs and religious practices that the informants claim to engage in and invoke, analyzing the motivations behind their practices, and how traditional religion is distributed within the community. This thesis consists of five published articles that present different parts of the empirical material, including the informants’ views of and uses of tradition, such as ritual practices and beliefs, but also as a tool for social, political, and identity formation. It also includes a comprehensive introduction, which includes additional field data and further empirical insights, in the context of relevant scholarly research. The thesis shows that the tradition has become both fragmented and heterogeneous, with individuals engaging with and practicing it in diverse ways and with different motivations. In the contemporary context, we observe shamans with congregations, individuals practicing vision quests and participating in rituals, as well as secret societies that remain active. The material points to several factors contributing to the current state of Nuu-chah-nulth traditions. Since the first contact with Europeans, these traditions have undergone transformations, influenced both by external forces and internal developments. One significant factor is the nature of missionary activity, Catholic or Protestant. Nevertheless, practices such as witchcraft and sorcery continue to exist, and their potential motivations are explored in the thesis. The thesis demonstrates that aspects of the traditional religion of the Nuu-chah-nulth have managed to survive centuries of oppression from the Canadian majority society, and in fact almost since the first contacts with Europeans, and remain alive today, albeit transformed, as traditional religion has constituted and continues to constitute an integral part of the group’s preserved linguistic, cultural, social, and political systems. The unifying theme that connects the various parts of the thesis thus touches not only on the rituals and religious beliefs of the traditional religion, but also on the strategies used to defend a traditional way of life against the pressures of the majority society. It also explores how their desire to revitalize old traditions is expressed, as well as the varying outcomes of this endeavor across different generations, groups, and individuals. The thesis shows that traditional religion today fulfills several functions, including serving as a tool for identity and politics, while also representing an efficacious reality for some informants. Central is a discussion of the concept of tradition, which recurs throughout the compilation. The study of religion among the Northwest Coast Native American peoples is a highly neglected field, and this study hopes to contribute new knowledge to it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207