No. 2 at FIFA may have transferred bribe money
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jerome Valcke may be unnamed 'high ranking' official in indictment The trail of bribe money supposedly funneled through FIFA may lead to the right-hand man of FIFA President Sepp Blatter. The New York Times is reporting that U.S. prosecutors believe Blatter's top lieutenant, FIFA Secretary General Jerome Valcke is the unnamed \high-ranking FIFA official\ who may have transferred 10 million dollars from FIFA to the personal account of former FIFA vice president Jack Warner. Warner was one of several top FIFA officials arrested last week. The 10 million was supposedly a payout to Warner for helping South Africa to secure the hosting rights for the 2010 World Cup. According to prosecutors, the transfer occurred in 2008, and was taken out of funds which would have gone to South Africa ahead of the Cup, since the country was late paying its agreed-to bribe to Warner. Valcke hasn't been charged or accused of anything, and he says in e-mail he didn't authorize the payment. But under FIFA regulations, Valcke IS responsible to maintaining the organization's accounts and can make transactions. On the same day the report tying Valcke to the bribes came out, FIFA announced he wouldn't be attending the opening of the FIFA Women's World Cup in Canada next week, saying \it's important that he attends to matters at FIFA's headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland.\
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.249 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".