Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores the transformative potential of integrating dance notation into architectural design processes, with the goal of re-centering the human body in spatial creation. Drawing from personal dance experiences and historical intersections between dance and architecture, this study examines the Bauhaus movement’s interdisciplinary practices and Anna Halprin’s inclusive spaces through dance. The research underscores the parallels between movement and place-making, demonstrating how dance notation captures nuanced relationships between the body, time, and spatial configurations. A new hybrid notation system is proposed that addresses the limitations in representing movement within architecture and landscape architecture drawings. The notation is tested on Florencia Bay in BC, in order to rethink how site and movement is recorded. The design of this thesis investigate how a movement centered notation system can be both analytical and generative. This project envisions a future where meaningful, sustainable designs emerge from a dance inspired understanding of space. This research advocates for a paradigm shift in architectural representation, asserting that a new notation, inspired by dance notation, can recenter the body in the design process, providing designs with more specificity of place and agency for human movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".