Osgoode Hall Law School launches Artist in Residence Fellowship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osgoode Hall Law School launches Artist in Residence Fellowship\nTORONTO, January 31, 2013 – In a bold and innovative move that brings together artistic creativity with the exploration of justice and the law, York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School has launched a search for an Artist in Residence Fellow for the 2013-14 academic year.\nA first call for expressions of interest, with an application deadline of Thursday, February 28, 2013, has been posted on the Osgoode website.\n“The Law School welcomes artists of all disciplines and projects focused on interpreting legal history, on examining law’s realities today, and imagining law’s future, whether in Canada or elsewhere in the world,” said Osgoode Dean Lorne Sossin.\n“We are particularly interested in projects that will reflect and enhance the diversity of the Osgoode community, and involve engagement and interaction with Osgoode students."\nSossin said the Artist in Residence Fellowship is part of a larger Osgoode commitment to researching and teaching law in context.\n“We want to explore law and its contexts and that calls for engagement with a wider world,” Sossin said. “We believe that our students, faculty and staff are strengthened by understanding law through diverse media and that an artist’s expression of ideas about justice and the law can enhance our own thinking on those subjects.”\nThe Artist in Residence will spend up to four months at Osgoode during either the fall or winter term of the 2013-14 academic year. The Artist in Residence Fellowship is one of several new fellowships that Osgoode has introduced recently in conjunction with its 2011-16 strategic plan that calls for increased emphasis on experiential education and the exploration of law in action; intensification of research that shapes the public debate; and greater community engagement.\nLast October, Osgoode announced the three inaugural recipients of its McMurtry Visiting Clinical Fellowship: lawyers Raj Anand, Joseph Arvay and Fay Faraday. The Fellows are each spending a term or part of a term this academic year at Osgoode providing mentorship to students and lawyers engaged in experiential education initiatives. Osgoode is inviting applications for the 2013-14 McMurtry Fellowships and more information can be found here.\nIn addition, the Law School has introduced the Osgoode Catalyst Fellowship, which brings to Osgoode emerging scholars who have a demonstrated interest in a career in law teaching. Pooja Parmar, who has completed graduate studies at the University of British Columbia Faculty of Law, is the inaugural holder of the Osgoode Catalyst Fellowship for the 2012-13 academic year.\n-30-\nFor further information, please contact:\nVirginia Corner\nCommunications Manager\nOsgoode Hall Law School of York University\nvcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca\n416-736-5820
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.339 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".