MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995624055

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGANGKUT (AIR CARRIER) DAN PENUMPANG ANGKUTAN UDARA MENURUT KONVENSI MONTREAL 1999 DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DI INDONESIA
\n STUDI : LION AIR JT610

2020· dissertation· id· W6995624055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAndalas University eThesis (Andalas University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAir transportContext (archaeology)Consumer law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK \nIndonesia sudah meratifikasi Konvensi Montreal 1999 yang dimuat dalam Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No.95 Tahun 2016 tentang pengesahan Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (Konvensi tentang unifikasi aturan-aturan tertentu untuk angkutan Internasional). Namun dalam penerapanya masih belum maksimal bahkan setelah terjadinya kecelakaan pesawat Lion Air JT 610 pada tahun 2018 silam. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pelindungan hukum terhadap pengangkut (Air Carrier) dan penumpang angkutan udara menurut konvensi Montreal 1999 dan bagaimana implementasinya di Indonesia studi : Lion Air JT 610?. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu meneliti pelindungan hukum terhadap pengangkut (Air Carrier) dan penumpang angkutan udara menurut konvensi Montreal 1999 dan bagaimana implementasinya di Indonesia dalam studi Lion Air JT 610. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (concept approach), hal ini karena akan meneliti peraturan perundang-undangan dan konsep-konsep yang terkait dengan obyek penelitian. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Konvensi Montreal 1999 telah memberikan modernisasi aturan dalam hal pertanggung jawaban dalam hukum udara terhadap penumpang dan angkutan udara (Air Carrier), namun dalam implementasinya di Indonesia masih belum terlaksana secara maksimal. Setelah melakukan studi terhadap kasus Lion Air JT 610 dapat disimpulkan bahwa belum adanya peraturan baru atau belum adanya revisi dan pembaharuan peraturan lama yang sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Konvensi Montreal 1999 setelah Konvensi Montreal 1999 diratifikasi oleh pemerintah Republik Indonesia. \n \nKata kunci : Pengangkut Angkutan Udara (Air Carrier); penumpang Angkutan Udara; Konvensi Montreal 1999, Lion Air JT 610

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAndalas University eThesis (Andalas University)Same topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207